What Is the Difference Between Agentic, Generative and Traditional AI?

Artificial intelligence is moving fast. Agentic AI and generative AI are now common in automation conversations. Exciting? Sure. But in finance, where accuracy, transparency, and compliance beat novelty, not all AI carries the same level of safety.

At DataServ, we welcome innovation while protecting clients. Agentic and generative AI have value in the right roles. For accounts payable automation, the safest, most reliable approach remains traditional AI guided by rules, trained on real financial data, and fully explainable.

Our goal isn’t to knock new tech. It’s to clarify how each approach works so finance leaders can choose tools that keep controls intact.

Traditional AI for AP: Deterministic, Audit-Ready Automation

Traditional AI for AP means supervised machine learning plus deterministic business rules. We train on invoices, POs, receipts, and historical exception outcomes, then apply explicit tolerances and controls so the system reaches the same conclusion every time with the same inputs.

For example, AutoVouch™ performs tolerance-based two and three-way matching: it verifies header and line data against the PO and receipt, applies client-defined thresholds for price and quantity, enforces unit-of-measure and tax logic, and only schedules an invoice for payment when all checks pass. Items outside tolerance route to the right owner with full context. Upstream, a human validation loop confirms critical fields before matching, which is why clients achieve high touchless rates without sacrificing auditability.

For more than fifteen years, DataServ’s AI has been trained specifically on millions of AP invoices. It doesn’t rely on external datasets or general-purpose language models. Its purpose is to process financial documents accurately and consistently. In environments with internal controls, audits, and compliance demands, predictability is essential. These strengths align with industry analysis that emphasizes dependable capture, matching, and validation as organizations pursue touchless processing.

Generative AI in AP: Useful For Language, Not Financial Decisions

Generative AI uses large language models to produce text, summarize information, and answer questions. That makes it useful for drafting emails, policy Q&A, or summarizing exception notes. It can reduce manual communication and speed documentation.

However, generative AI is non-deterministic. It can produce content that sounds correct but isn’t factually accurate, which introduces risk in finance. There’s an explainability gap with large language models: outputs are non-deterministic and the provenance of a given answer can’t be fully traced, which means they aren’t audit-grade for invoice coding or approvals. DataServ’s content on unsafe AI highlights the danger of systems that hallucinate or produce conclusions that cannot be explained.

Generative AI can support AP teams in advisory roles, but it should not classify invoices, determine coding, or influence transactions. Those decisions must stay grounded in deterministic logic.

Agentic AI in AP: Automates Tasks But Requires Strict Controls

Agentic AI is designed to take actions, plan workflows, call tools, and operate with a degree of autonomy. It can break down goals into smaller steps and perform tasks across systems. In many business settings, this is powerful and can reduce manual work.

However, in finance, autonomy must be carefully controlled. Agentic systems need clear guardrails that prevent unintended actions, restrict access to sensitive data, and ensure every step is documented. Because agentic AI is still in its early stages, many organizations are taking a cautious, wait-and-see approach as best practices, regulations, and risk frameworks continue to evolve. Gartner reports that only 3% of businesses are currently using agentic AI that executes tasks autonomously.

At DataServ, our approach to AI emphasizes transparency, verifiability, and accountability. For that reason, we use clear-box AI models rather than opaque “black box” systems. This allows you to understand how decisions are made, evaluate outcomes, and maintain oversight of automated processes.

Even industry guidance outside AP stresses that agentic tools require strong oversight to avoid unpredictable or unsafe behavior. This is particularly important with liabilities, where one incorrect action can create a payment error or increase exposure to fraud. In fact, AI now plays a role in more than 50% of fraud cases, up from the roughly 20% of fraud incidents in 2024.

Why DataServ Continues To Take A Conservative, Finance-First Approach

We track agentic and generative AI closely and see real opportunities to support AP teams. Our focus is protecting clients: consistent results, clean audits, alignment with financial controls, and minimal risk.

Traditional AI remains the most reliable approach for AP automation because it’s transparent, predictable, and trained exclusively on financial documents. Our invoice-focused AI is already trained and has spent more than fifteen years learning from real AP data. It’s not a general-purpose large language model and isn’t influenced by outside content. It’s purpose-built for accuracy and stability, which is exactly what AP leaders need.

Innovation will continue to shape the future of automation. We’re committed to delivering AI that is secure, financial-grade, and ethical, as well as to introducing new advancements into AP only when the right controls are firmly in place. We work every day as your partner, advancing AI you can trust.

What Is the Difference Between Agentic, Generative and Traditional AI?

Traditional AI for AP: Deterministic, Audit-Ready Automation

Generative AI in AP: Useful For Language, Not Financial Decisions

Agentic AI in AP: Automates Tasks But Requires Strict Controls

Why DataServ Continues To Take A Conservative, Finance-First Approach

Subscribe to ReadDataServ Articles

5 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Manage Accounts Payable OCR Software In-House

6 Common Roadblocks to Accounts Payable Automation

Struggling with Multiple ERPs After an Acquisition? AP Automation is the Answer